What Brokerages Actually Spend on Technology Per Agent: The First Industry Benchmark
28% of brokerages spend under $50 per agent per month on tech. 18% spend over $200. Here is the first benchmark data.
Until now, there has been no published number for what a brokerage should spend on technology per agent. You could ask around. You could guess based on your own budget. But there was no data set to compare against.
The 2024 State of Real Estate Brokerage Technology Survey, conducted by TotalBrokerage and T3 Sixty with over 100 respondents, changed that. For the first time, we asked brokerages directly: what is your monthly technology cost per agent?
The range was wider than most people expected.
The numbers
Approximately 28% of brokerages spend $50 or less per agent per month on technology. Approximately 22% spend between $51 and $100. Approximately 15% fall in the $101 to $150 range. Another approximately 15% land between $151 and $200. And approximately 18% spend $201 or more per agent per month.
| Monthly tech cost per agent | % of respondents |
|---|---|
| $50 and below | ~28% |
| $51 - $100 | ~22% |
| $101 - $150 | ~15% |
| $151 - $200 | ~15% |
| $201 and higher | ~18% |
That is a 4x spread from the lowest tier to the highest. A brokerage with 200 agents spending $50 per head is looking at $10,000 a month. A brokerage spending $200 per head with the same agent count is at $40,000. Same industry, same general business model, $360,000 a year apart.
This is Year 1 data. We did not have this question in the 2023 survey. Future surveys will track how these numbers move, and now there is a baseline to measure against.
What that variance actually tells you
The gap between $50 and $200 is not just about who has a bigger budget. It reflects three things: how many tools a brokerage runs, how much overlap exists between those tools, and whether anyone has done the math on what each tool actually costs per head once you factor in adoption.
From the same survey, approximately 65% of brokerages pay for five or fewer tools. Only approximately 5% pay for more than 20. But the tool count alone does not explain the spending variance. A brokerage paying for four tools at $200 per agent is getting crushed on per-tool cost. A brokerage paying for twelve tools at $100 per agent has negotiated better or found cheaper options, but now has twelve logins, twelve data silos, and twelve things that probably do not talk to each other.
We wrote about the tool proliferation problem in detail in Why Brokerages Are Drowning in Software. The cost data here gives that problem a dollar figure.
Where the money leaks
Approximately 40% of respondents said they increased their technology spending compared to the prior year. Approximately 55% did not. When we asked brokerages that made changes what drove the decision, approximately 45% said improved functionality. Approximately 12% said cost reduction. Approximately 10% said better integration.
So nearly half of the brokerages that changed their tech did it to get better capabilities, not to save money. That is fine in theory. But if you are adding tools for functionality without removing the ones they replace, your per-agent cost goes in one direction.
The real cost problem in brokerage technology is not any single expensive tool. It is the accumulation of subscriptions that overlap, software that nobody fully uses, and systems that require manual work to keep in sync. Your operations staff re-enters data from one tool into another. Your accounting team exports reports from three places and reconciles them in a spreadsheet. Your compliance coordinator chases documents across email, a transaction platform, and a shared drive.
That coordination tax does not show up on a software invoice. But it is the biggest line item in your actual technology cost.
What you should be getting at each price tier
There is no single correct number for technology cost per agent. But there is a way to think about whether your spending is justified.
At $50 per agent or below, you are running lean. You probably have basic transaction management and maybe e-signatures. You are almost certainly relying on spreadsheets for commissions, doing compliance checks manually, and pulling reports by hand. This works at small scale. It breaks when you grow.
Between $100 and $150, you should have a real system of record for your back office. That means transaction management, commission automation, compliance workflows, and reporting that does not require someone to build it from scratch every month. If you are in this range and still running commissions in Excel, something is wrong with your tool selection.
Above $200, you are paying for a lot of software. The question is whether it is connected. If your brokerage has full visibility into every transaction, every commission, every compliance item, and every financial metric in real time without anyone manually assembling that picture, the spend may be justified. If your operations team is still the glue holding five platforms together, you are paying premium prices for a fragmented experience.
Approximately 30% of brokerages in the survey said their technology simply checks a box. If you are spending $150 per agent per month on technology that checks a box, that is a problem worth solving.
The consolidation math
The brokerages in the 2024 survey that reported the most satisfaction with their technology had something in common: they had fewer tools doing more work. Not fewer capabilities. Fewer separate subscriptions covering more of the operation.
This matches what we have seen since the 2023 survey. The budget is not the problem. The architecture is. When your back office runs on one connected platform instead of five disconnected ones, three things happen. Your per-agent cost goes down because you eliminate overlap. Your staff time goes down because data flows instead of getting re-entered. And your visibility goes up because reporting pulls from one source of truth instead of a patchwork.
We break down the financial case for consolidation in The Budget-Friendly Advantage of All-in-One Brokerage Solutions and Combat the Changing Economy by Consolidating Expenses.
Using this benchmark
This is the first year this data exists. That makes it useful as a starting point, not a target. Here is how to use it.
Pull your total monthly technology spend. Divide it by your active agent count. See where you land on the table above. Then ask yourself two questions: Can I name what every dollar of that number is buying? And can my operations team answer basic financial questions about my brokerage without building a report from scratch?
If the answer to either question is no, the number itself matters less than the gap between what you are paying and what you are getting.
What TotalBrokerage does about this
TotalBrokerage is a back-office operating system for brokerages. It puts transactions, commissions, compliance, reporting, e-signatures, and agent management in one place. You stop paying for five tools that each do one thing and start running your operation on a single system of record.
That does not mean you throw out your existing CRM or other agent-facing tools. It means your back office stops being the part of your brokerage held together by spreadsheets and manual work.
If you want to see what that looks like for your specific operation, book a demo.
FAQ
What is the average technology cost per agent for a real estate brokerage?
Based on the 2024 State of Real Estate Brokerage Technology Survey by TotalBrokerage and T3 Sixty, there is no single average because the distribution is wide. Approximately 28% of brokerages spend $50 or less per agent per month, approximately 22% spend $51 to $100, approximately 15% spend $101 to $150, approximately 15% spend $151 to $200, and approximately 18% spend over $200. The majority of brokerages fall at $100 per agent per month or below.
Why is there such a wide range in brokerage technology spending?
The 4x spread between the lowest and highest tiers reflects differences in tool count, tool overlap, operational maturity, and brokerage size. A brokerage running three tools at $50 per agent has a very different operation than one running fifteen tools at $200 per agent. The number of tools alone does not explain the gap. How connected those tools are and how much manual work they require matters just as much.
How many technology tools do brokerages pay for?
Approximately 65% of brokerages pay for five or fewer technology tools. Approximately 15% pay for six to ten. Only approximately 5% pay for more than 20. This is the brokerage-provided count. It does not include tools that agents and teams purchase on their own.
Should I try to reduce my per-agent technology cost?
Not necessarily. The goal is not the lowest possible number. The goal is knowing what you are getting for what you spend. A brokerage at $150 per agent with a fully connected back office, automated commissions, and real-time reporting is in a stronger position than one at $75 per agent running everything on spreadsheets. The question to ask is whether your spending produces visibility, accuracy, and control, or whether it just produces more software subscriptions.
How can I benchmark my brokerage's technology spending?
Divide your total monthly technology spend by your active agent count. Compare to the distribution from the 2024 survey. Then go beyond the number: look at what your spending actually produces. Can you pull a profitability report by agent or office without manual work? Do commissions calculate automatically? Is your compliance process tracked in a system or in someone's inbox? The dollar figure is a starting point. The operational outcomes are what matter.
Is this benchmark data available for previous years?
No. The 2024 survey is the first time per-agent technology cost was measured. The 2023 State of Real Estate Brokerage Technology Survey covered tool count, budget allocation, and satisfaction, but did not include a per-agent cost question. Future surveys will continue tracking this metric, which will make it possible to see trends over time.
.png)
.svg)